🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.